Age. (1952)

Jevons, Meters. P., and you may Parker, Yards. T. (1964). J. din. Highway., 17, 243-250. Lidwell, 0. M. (1959). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 18,49-52. Live, We., and Nichols, An excellent. C. (1961).J. inject. Dis.,108, 195-204. Macdonald, Good. (1946). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 5, 230-233. Meyer, W. (1966). Zentbl. Bukt. PurusitKde., I . Abt. Orig., 201,465-481. Meyer, W. (1967). J. Hyg., Camb., 65,439-447. Nakagawa, Yards. (1960). Jap. J. damp. Res., 8, 331-342. Oeding, P., and you can Williams, Roentgen. Age. 0. (1958). step 3. Hyg., Cumb., 56, 445-454. Pagano, J. S., Farrer, S. Yards., Plotkin, S. Good., Brachman, P. S., Fekety, F. Roentgen., and you will Pidcoe, V. (1960). Research, Letter.Y., 131, 927-928. Parker, Meters. T. (1966). During the “New Scientific Basis regarding Treatments Yearly Feedback” (J. P. Ross, ed.), pp. 157-173. University off London, This new Athlone Press, London area. Parker, Meters. T., Todinson, An effective. J. H., and you can Williams, R. Age. 0. (1955). J. Hyg., Cumb., 53,458-473.

The parasexual years as well as use in genetic analysis

Pether, J. V. S. (1968).J. Hyg., C a beneficial d . , 66,605. Poole, P. Meters., and you can Baker, J. R. (1966). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., twenty-five, 116-123. Report (1959). Int. Bull. bact. Nomencl.,nine, 115-118. Report (1963). Int. Bull. bact. Nomencl., 13, 119-122. Statement (1967). Int. Bull. buct. Nomencl., 17, 113-125. Declaration (1971). Int. Bull. syst. Buct., 21, 165, 167, 171. Rountree, P. Yards. (1959). J. gen. Microbiol., 20,620-633. Rountree, P. M., and you will Asheshov, Elizabeth. H. (1961). J. gen. Microbiol., twenty-six, 111-122. Rountree, P. Meters., and you can Freeman, B. Yards. (1955). Med. J. Aust., 2, 157-161. Ruys, A good. C., and you will Borst, J. (1959). Antonie wan Leeuwenhoek, 25, 237-240. Seto, J. T., and you may Wilson, J. B. (1958). Have always been.3. wet. Res., 19, 241-246. Smith, H. W. (1948a).J. Hyg., C u d . , 46,7681. Smith, H. W. (1948b);Jp. Road. Ther., 58, 179-188. Smith, H. W. (1954).J. Street. Buc

Tarr, H. A good. (1958). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 17, 64-72. Watson, W. A good. (1965). Veterinarian. Rec., 77, 477-480. Wentworth, B., Romig, W. Roentgen., and Dixon, W. J. (1964). J. contaminate. Dis.,114, 179188.

Williams, R. Elizabeth. 0. (1957). Zentbl. Bakt. PurasitKde., I . Abt. Orig., 168, 528-532. Williams, Roentgen. Elizabeth. O., and Jevons, Meters. P. (1961). Zentbl. Bukt. ParasitKde., I Abt. Orig., 181,349-358. Williams, Roentgen. E. O., and you may Rippon, J. J. Hyg., Camb., 50, 320-353. Williams, R. Age. O., Rippon, J. Elizabeth., and you will Dowsett, L. Yards. (1953). Lancet, i, 510-514. Wilson, G. S., and you may Atkinson, J. D. (1945). Lancet, we, 647-649.

Genetic Analysis into the Mini-bacteria DAVID An effective. HOPWOOD John Znnes Institute, Norwikh, The united kingdomt I. Inclusion . 11. Segregation due to the fact Evidence of Effortless Hereditary Control . An https://datingranking.net/es/citas-bhm/ effective. The new genetic approach to biology . B. The new identification out of segregation . 111. The foundation of Genetic Mapping . B. New sequencing from loci towards the good linkage map: multi-grounds crosses C. Linkagegroups . D. Genetic good-design . Age. Removal mapping . IV. Useful Hereditary Evaluating . A great. Prominence examination . Bplementation tests . C. Epistasis . V. Genetic Data within the Eukaryotic Microorganisms . An excellent. Standard factors . 1. dos. Tetrad investigation . B. Hereditary studies particularly bacteria step 1. Aspergillus nidulans . . 2. Aspergillus niger and other “imperfect” fungi 3. Neurospora crassa . 4. Most other ascomycetes . 5. Yeasts . 6. Filamentous basidiomycetes . seven. Ustilago . 8. Chlamydomonas reinhardii . 9. Ciliates . ten. Slime moulds VI. Hereditary Studies inside the Prokaryotes . An excellent. Standard considerations . 1. Virility products and you can conjugational mapping . 2. Transduction and you can co-transduction . step 3. Sales and you can co-conversion cuatro. Non-selective research .

50 51 57 61 61 65 66 69 69 73 75 77 78 80 81 81 83 84 91 94

Genetic study specifically organisms step 1. Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium and other Enteric germs . 2. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and you may Ps. putida . step three. Bacillus subtilis cuatro. Streptmyces coelicolor and other actinomycetes . 5. Almost every other germs C. Certified mapping actions independent of recombination VII. Genetic Investigation from inside the Viruses A beneficial. Standard factors . step one. Particular widespread genomes 2. Features off trojan genes B. Hereditary research in particular viruses step 1. Bacteriophages dos. Animal worms step 3. Bush worms VIII. Finishing Opinions References .